Page 1 of 2

SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 11:08 am
by JillJillJill
Eric, Jacob, Thom, and I are all stuck at their house. If you want to hang out in filth come on over!

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 11:21 am
by El Rhino
Yeah, if anyone wants to come over and drink hot chocolate, pop popcorn and watch Red Dawn or help me shovel come on over.

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 12:20 pm
by JillJillJill
red dawn!

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:46 pm
by Nick
Since I'm stranded at home today, I got to watch the Price As Right for the first time since that fatass Drew Carey took over. He is the worst.

I think I'm gonna go bake some chicken taquitos and drink some raspberry lemonade now.

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 2:00 pm
by TooManyHumyns
Nick wrote:Since I'm stranded at home today, I got to watch the Price As Right for the first time since that fatass Drew Carey took over. He is the worst.

I think I'm gonna go bake some chicken taquitos and drink some raspberry lemonade now.
Nick wrote:Cool story, bro.

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 4:37 pm
by tylerjames515
TooManyHumyns wrote:
Nick wrote:Since I'm stranded at home today, I got to watch the Price As Right for the first time since that fatass Drew Carey took over. He is the worst.

I think I'm gonna go bake some chicken taquitos and drink some raspberry lemonade now.
Nick wrote:Cool story, hansel.
8)

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 9:10 pm
by Bullet Tooth
i bought Predator at wal-mart for $5. i wish my work would allow a snow day.

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 9:56 pm
by kurtis
both jobs closed so I just hung out and had to dig our driveway out. sidewalks were 3 foot drifts so that sucked.

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 10:14 pm
by Nick
kurtis wrote:both jobs closed so I just hung out and had to dig our driveway out. sidewalks were 3 foot drifts so that sucked.
Yeah. I spent a good 2-2.5 hour digging my girlfriend's car out of a snowdrift in the driveway. Sucked.

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 10:31 pm
by El Rhino
I would've made her do it.

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 11:20 pm
by Nick
El Rhino wrote:I would've made her do it.
:roll:

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 1:44 am
by ilikehorses
i don't get snow days, so i was working. but it's okay, i read a lot and saw a minor amount of blood.

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 5:18 am
by Varg
Wait wait wait...record cold and snowfalls? This is suppose to be one of the warmest years on record?!

Image

Image

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 5:19 am
by Joe
Man stfu and upload more riffage.

-Joe.

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 11:52 am
by ilikehorses
HAHAHA. i was going to make our annual "It snowed, so global warming is false, right guys?" thread, but i decided against it. thank you, varg, for never learning new tricks.

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:18 pm
by inx515xhell
Image
SNOW DAYS ARE FOR PUSSIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEES!

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:41 pm
by JillJillJill
cool. syke.

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 10:50 pm
by Varg
ilikehorses wrote:HAHAHA. i was going to make our annual "It snowed, so global warming is false, right guys?" thread, but i decided against it. thank you, varg, for never learning new tricks.


HAHAHA, http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=64734

"More than 31,000 scientists across the U.S. – including more than 9,000 Ph.D.s in fields such as atmospheric science, climatology, Earth science, environment and dozens of other specialties – have signed a petition rejecting "global warming," the assumption that the human production of greenhouse gases is damaging Earth's climate.

"There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate," the petition states. "Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth." "


u mad?

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 10:54 pm
by jjjsXe
COLORADO IS FOR HIIIIIIPPPPPIEEEEEEEESSSSSSSS!

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 11:05 pm
by Nick
Varg wrote:"Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth." "


u mad?
Kept me intrigued up until this sentence. I mean, I'm not sure I believe the whole global warming phenomenon, but what I do believe is that we need to cut down on the pollutions/emissions/environmental travesties we, as humans, create. This makes it sound like all this stuff might actually be "good" for natural Earth environments? What a bunch of Rush Limbaugh wackadoo, right-winger bullshit that is.

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 11:32 pm
by TooManyHumyns
Nick wrote: what I do believe is that we need to cut down on the pollutions/emissions/environmental travesties we, as humans, create.
question, honest question. why?

also...
im not sure i believe or dissagree with the theory of climate change, but its december, its supposed to be cold, the right wingers stepped it down when it was 50 in november......both arguements are irrelevant...and the obvious...climate change, climate being statistics accumulated over an extended period of time..not just one random day where it is randomly hot, or exceedingly cold...no discussion can happen with shutdown statements like that...blah blah blah.

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 11:49 pm
by ilikehorses
Varg wrote:
ilikehorses wrote:HAHAHA. i was going to make our annual "It snowed, so global warming is false, right guys?" thread, but i decided against it. thank you, varg, for never learning new tricks.


HAHAHA, http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=64734

"More than 31,000 scientists across the U.S. – including more than 9,000 Ph.D.s in fields such as atmospheric science, climatology, Earth science, environment and dozens of other specialties – have signed a petition rejecting "global warming," the assumption that the human production of greenhouse gases is damaging Earth's climate.

"There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate," the petition states. "Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth." "


u mad?
i did a quick search on some of those signers. i did not know orthopedic surgeons, staff directors of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, phds in astronomy, computer professionals, and others whose names seem not to exist outside of this list were experts on global climate change.

and i picked random names from different parts of the alphabet. each person's credentials were either laughable or i was unable to find any information about them.

u mad?

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 11:49 pm
by ilikehorses
TooManyHumyns wrote:
Nick wrote: what I do believe is that we need to cut down on the pollutions/emissions/environmental travesties we, as humans, create.
question, honest question. why?

also...
im not sure i believe or dissagree with the theory of climate change, but its december, its supposed to be cold, the right wingers stepped it down when it was 50 in november......both arguements are irrelevant...and the obvious...climate change, climate being statistics accumulated over an extended period of time..not just one random day where it is randomly hot, or exceedingly cold...no discussion can happen with shutdown statements like that...blah blah blah.
that is why varg is such a joke.

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 12:06 am
by @nonymous
*obligatory CrimethInc. post/political faggotry content*

related to content that is unrelated to overall thread content:
http://www.crimethinc.com/texts/atoz/climate.php

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 1:03 am
by El Rhino
ilikehorses wrote: and i picked random names from different parts of the alphabet. each person's credentials were either laughable or i was unable to find any information about them.

May I see your credentials so I can determine whether or not you have the appropriate credentials to determine the laughability of the credentials of others concerning global warming?

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:44 am
by Thom
OH MY GOD YOU ARE ALL A BUNCH OF DUMBASSES.

EVERY.
SINGLE.
ONE OF YOU.


except ed. who I am sorry I didn't hang out with tonight. I made a mistake in not doing so.

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 5:40 am
by Varg
ilikehorses wrote:
TooManyHumyns wrote:
Nick wrote: what I do believe is that we need to cut down on the pollutions/emissions/environmental travesties we, as humans, create.
question, honest question. why?

also...
im not sure i believe or dissagree with the theory of climate change, but its december, its supposed to be cold, the right wingers stepped it down when it was 50 in november......both arguements are irrelevant...and the obvious...climate change, climate being statistics accumulated over an extended period of time..not just one random day where it is randomly hot, or exceedingly cold...no discussion can happen with shutdown statements like that...blah blah blah.
that is why varg is such a joke.

If you were half as smart as you think you are, you probably would've looked up my posts from Summers past. I'm surprised you'd be so easily duped as it's well known that I put this stuff up ALL the time, not seasonally.

Furthermore, if you were half as smart as you think, you probably would've stayed out of this altogether because of the CLIMATEGATE emails that were exposed a few weeks ago which revealed many scientists admitting to falsifying data.

Good luck defending that.

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 9:38 am
by Nick
TooManyHumyns wrote:
Nick wrote: what I do believe is that we need to cut down on the pollutions/emissions/environmental travesties we, as humans, create.
question, honest question. why?
Because it would be nice for people to be able to breath clean air, drink water free of pesticides, pharmaceuticals and other man-made chemicals and keep habitats intact for endangered animals, because they are sorta rad to look at. I dunno, maybe I'm batshit insane?

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 10:54 am
by TooManyHumyns
so because some animals are 'rad to look at' and you don't want to breathe dirty air, and drink dirty water, although we have an outstanding water works, best in the country.... and you assume these things are somehow debilitating to your health i presume?

Re: SNOWNADO DEATH PARTY

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 11:49 am
by ilikehorses
Varg wrote:
ilikehorses wrote: that is why varg is such a joke.

If you were half as smart as you think you are, you probably would've looked up my posts from Summers past. I'm surprised you'd be so easily duped as it's well known that I put this stuff up ALL the time, not seasonally.

Furthermore, if you were half as smart as you think, you probably would've stayed out of this altogether because of the CLIMATEGATE emails that were exposed a few weeks ago which revealed many scientists admitting to falsifying data.

Good luck defending that.
sure you do, but every winter, without fail, four years running, we have our annual "snow means there's no global warming, fools!" thread.

and i don't care about some 13 year old emails you haven't read that foxnews told you prove scientists are falsifying data. because there have been the same reports coming the other way, that opponents of the theory of radical climate change have falsified data and reports. doesn't add validity to either your earlier post or your stance on climate change.

youre (still) boring.