515 Crew

www.drudgereport.com

or http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080829/ap_ ... veepstakes


...discuss

it's a real laugh riot!

Very cynical choice. "Who will get me elected" rather than "who is best to lead the country should I die or otherwise vacate the presidency". Undercuts the inexperience argument.


Epic failure.

her voice is kind of grating.

WOULD

robdigi wrote:Very cynical choice. "Who will get me elected" rather than "who is best to lead the country should I die or otherwise vacate the presidency". Undercuts the inexperience argument.


Epic failure.

Actually, no, you just pretty much described the basis for choosing a VP candidate.

Actually, no, historically VP choice has little effect on voters.


Irresponsible, desperate



fail

A woman as a Vice Presidential candidate? It's been done before.

Tonie Nathan, 1972.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodora_Nathan

the more i think about it, the more i hate anyone who doesn't realize it's a shameless ploy to get the disappointed female vote.

Whats the difference between your wife and your dog?
Walking the dog is relaxing.

What's the first thing a woman does when she gets back from the battered women's clinic?
The god damned dishes if she knows what's good for her.

What is the difference between a battery and a woman?
A battery has a positive side.

What have you done wrong when you wife comes out of the kitchen and starts nagging you? made the chain too long.

Why did the woman cross the road?
Wait, better question, why is she out of the kitchen!?

If we were voting for MILFs, she'd get my vote. I would bang the Republican out of her.

elliot wrote:If we were voting for MILFs, she'd get my vote. I would bang the Republican out of her.

I think she would be more likely to knock the liberal out of you....

jnice wrote:A woman as a Vice Presidential candidate? It's been done before.

Tonie Nathan, 1972.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodora_Nathan

Are you forgetting about Mondale in '84?

Not that anyone should have ran against Reagan anyways, nobody stood a chance.

robdigi wrote:Actually, no, historically VP choice has little effect on voters.


Irresponsible, desperate



fail

People that overuse the word "fail" on the internet are awesome.

I'll be in Denver October 15-19th come fight me.

Tampa Josh wrote: People that overuse the word "fail" on the internet are awesome.

I only use it when applicable. Plus, that was a refrain.



Her choice was the biggest sign of weakness from the campaign so far.

robdigi wrote:

Tampa Josh wrote: People that overuse the word "fail" on the internet are awesome.

I only use it when applicable. Plus, that was a refrain.



Her choice was the biggest sign of weakness from the campaign so far.

It def wasn't the strongest choice, but I don't see it as a bad choice per say. She is better than many might think. She used to be my Mayor like 12 years ago and lived down the street from me. I'm probably a little biased from eating Thanksgiving dinner with her family and watching the Super Bowl with them, but she is a pretty strong willed woman and I don't think Biden is going to eat her up in debate like so many left wingers are expecting.

Oh and the "fight me" thing was an obvious joke if you didn't get it.

Yeah she sounds like one tough cookie.... "Are you ready to be President?" "Absolutely. Yup, Yup"

it's cool doggie. I knew it wasn't serious and that's why I didn't get all upset n shit about it.



also I am drunk


that's why I called you doggie

in all seriousness "strong willed" doesn't stand up well to "national experience" and on the vice presidential level "international experience"


small town mayor turned governor of sparsely populated state vs senior senator with hell of international credibility


at least she will draw the votes of those woman who would have voted for hilary based on gender rather than policy.

It really doesn't matter when both major party candidates are worthless pieces of shit.

king diamond 2k8!

This confirms that I'll be voting for Mccain (there is absolutely no sarcasm included in that statement. I wasn't going to vote at all, but I am now.

speaking of squirrels, she reminds me of this gal:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RlK0Xd4c2c

Joey Chaos wrote:This confirms that I'll be voting for Mccain (there is absolutely no sarcasm included in that statement. I wasn't going to vote at all, but I am now.

i don't get it. you weren't going to vote for him, but now that he picked a woman you never heard of youre going to?

ilikehorses wrote:

Joey Chaos wrote:This confirms that I'll be voting for Mccain (there is absolutely no sarcasm included in that statement. I wasn't going to vote at all, but I am now.

i don't get it. you weren't going to vote for him, but now that he picked a woman you never heard of youre going to?

she can field dress a moose.

On that basis, he should just write in Jesse Ventura.

He's hunted HUMAN. I don't know about his field dressing ability, though.

ilikehorses wrote:

Joey Chaos wrote:This confirms that I'll be voting for Mccain (there is absolutely no sarcasm included in that statement. I wasn't going to vote at all, but I am now.

i don't get it. you weren't going to vote for him, but now that he picked a woman you never heard of youre going to?

My second amendment rights are very important to me, and with Palin in office, I know I won't lose even a fraction of them. Obama, on the other hand is in favor of several weapons bans.

Joey Chaos wrote: My second amendment rights are very important to me, and with Palin in office, I know I won't lose even a fraction of them. Obama, on the other hand is in favor of several weapons bans.

::slaps forehead::