Moderators: kylervk, Joe, Hank Fist, inx515xhell
For all Sigur Ros lovers.....
These pretentious fucks need to be dimebagged. Watch the interview ugh...
http://www.npr.org/blogs/bryantpark/200 ... o_bad.html
http://www.npr.org/blogs/bryantpark/200 ... o_bad.html
Re: For all Sigur Ros lovers.....
It's pretty painful to watch the interviewer try to get these cock gobblers to talk. It seems there personalities match the lame dick music these fucks play.
If The Flintstones has taught us anything, it's that pelicans can be used to mix cement.
- Wheatstache
- Superhero
- Posts: 1792
- Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 8:06 pm
- Location: School Street
- Crumpty Williams
- Spatula Spam
- Posts: 2087
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:22 pm
- Contact:
Re: For all Sigur Ros lovers.....
To be fair, that interviewer did a pretty terrible job of asking questions as well...
i fucking rule.
- ilikehorses
- Fun\Death Dealer
- Posts: 3260
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:02 pm
- Location: des moines
Re: For all Sigur Ros lovers.....
all the interviewer's questions were yes/no questions. which is a HORRIBLE way of getting people to talk.
Even today, I can't see a car run a red light without instantly having an image flash into my head of a man's erect penis, penetrating a watermelon.
UGH I SUCK
UGH I SUCK
Re: For all Sigur Ros lovers.....
Thier PR dude asked if they could be on the show. So, fuck 'em.
- robdigi
- Posts: 3152
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 5:55 pm
- Location: bedford-stuyvesant, brooklyn zoo
- Contact:
Re: For all Sigur Ros lovers.....
who's next on the "music that sucked yet everyone had a boner for in 2002" retrospective?
All that's missin' is the retired band teacher with the self-inflicted gunshot wound!
- Crumpty Williams
- Spatula Spam
- Posts: 2087
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:22 pm
- Contact:
Re: For all Sigur Ros lovers.....
For the record, I for one, never had a boner for this band
i fucking rule.
- Crumpty Williams
- Spatula Spam
- Posts: 2087
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:22 pm
- Contact:
Re: For all Sigur Ros lovers.....
My point was simply to indicate that my commentary on the interviewer's weak questions came from a neutral observer.
i fucking rule.